Physics-Informed Evolutionary Artificial Intelligence for Intelligent Multi-Objective Collaborative Optimization of Vehicle Door Closing Performance

Authors

  • Jianhong Hao CATARC Engineering Research Institute (Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China
  • Lili Su CATARC Engineering Research Institute (Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China
  • Haipeng Xia CATARC Engineering Research Institute (Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/5kw76558

Keywords:

Physics-Informed AI; Evolutionary Symbolic Regression; Door Closing Energy; Ear Pressure Comfort; Multi-objective Optimization; Cross-domain Transfer Correction.

Abstract

To resolve the complex multi-objective conflict among high sealing airtightness, door closing energy, and ear pressure comfort in commercial vehicle cabs, this paper proposes a physics-informed evolutionary artificial intelligence (AI) framework for forward collaborative optimization. Firstly, a variable-parameter flow-field and energy coupling platform with continuous, independent adjustability (cabin volume, pressure relief area, sealing reaction force, and hinge inclination angles) was developed to realize the physical decoupling of multiple coupled fields. Based on an L27  orthogonal design, a physics-informed evolutionary symbolic regression algorithm driven by genetic programming was introduced to automatically discover explicit, interpretable governing formulations, establishing a high-precision nonlinear prediction model (R2>0.92). Furthermore, to overcome acoustic boundary differences and unstructured mechanical dissipation between the test bench and the actual vehicle, a physics-guided cross-domain transfer correction strategy was proposed, which successfully suppressed the real-vehicle prediction error to within 5%. Engineering verification on a production commercial vehicle demonstrates that through this intelligent collaborative optimization, the minimum door closing energy was remarkably reduced from 39.61 J to 12.36 J (a decrease of 68.8%), effectively mitigating the engineering contradiction of “difficult door closing” and “ear tenderness” while maintaining superior vehicle sealing performance. This study provides an efficient, interpretable, and prototype-free intelligent methodology for forward vehicle body development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Li, S., et al. (2021). Simulation and optimization of cabin pressure fluctuation induced by door closing. Shock and Vibration, 2021, 6656663. https://doi.org/ 10. 1155/ 2021/ 6656663.

[2] Shin, S.-H., & Cheong, C. (2022). Characterization and reduction of boom noise and cabin pressure fluctuation generated by tailgate closing of a hatchback vehicle. Applied Acoustics, 185, 108420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108420.

[3] Mao, J., Wang, D., Zhang, Y., et al. (2021). Analysis of the influence of body sealing system on door closing pressure based on fluid-structure interaction. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 40(4), 1856–1868. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484211040228.

[4] Lee, S., Kim, J., Park, Y., et al. (2022). Active control of cabin pressure for door closing comfort using a smart window system. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 23(2), 451–459. https: // doi. org/10.1007/s12239-022-0042-4.

[5] Choi, J., Lee, S., & Park, J. (2022). Prediction of door closing effort using a data-driven method with functional principal component analysis. Applied Sciences, 12(3), 1087. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ app 12031087.

[6] Bhat, S., Kumar, A., & Singh, R. (2018). Study of factors affecting door closing effort and its optimization. SAE Technical Paper, 2018-28-0026, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-28-0026.

[7] Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Li, S. (2022). Multi-objective optimization of door closing effort and sound quality for electric vehicles. Shock and Vibration, 2022, 4589213. https://doi.org/10. 1155/ 2022/ 4589213.

[8] Mao, J., Wang, D., Zhang, Y. (2021). Analysis of the influence of body sealing system on door closing pressure based on fluid-structure interaction. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 40(4), 1856–1868. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484211040228.

[9] Bhat, S., Kumar, A., & Singh, R. (2018). Study of factors affecting door closing effort and its optimization. SAE Technical Paper, 2018-28-0026, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-28-0026.

[10] Reddy, P. K., & Kumar, S. (2016). Door closing effort reduction through latch optimization. SAE Technical Paper, 2016-01-1323, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1323.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hao, J., Su, L., & Xia, H. (2026). Physics-Informed Evolutionary Artificial Intelligence for Intelligent Multi-Objective Collaborative Optimization of Vehicle Door Closing Performance. Scientific Journal of Technology, 8(9), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.54691/5kw76558