Deep Learning-Based Stripe Restoration Algorithm for Landsat 7

Authors

  • Peng Yin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/wt90cw18

Keywords:

Landsat 7; Stripe Restoration; Deep Learning; Attention Mechanism; Image Inpainting; Remote Sensing.

Abstract

Since the failure of the Scan Line Corrector (SLC) on the Landsat 7 ETM+ sensor in 2003, approximately 22% of pixels in acquired images are missing in a regular stripe pattern, severely limiting their application in time-series analysis and land cover monitoring. To address the limitations of traditional methods in modeling complex land surfaces and their tendency to introduce spectral distortions, this paper proposes a stripe-aware deep learning restoration network called SINet (Stripe Inpainting Network). The network leverages a Stripe Attention Module (SAM) to exploit the geometric prior of stripes and aggregate features along the stripe direction, and a Spectral Reconstruction Module (SRM) to model multi-band correlations and preserve spectral fidelity. A hybrid loss function combining pixel loss, perceptual loss, spectral angle loss, and gradient loss is designed. Experiments conducted in the Zhengzhou-Kaifeng-Xuchang junction area of Henan Province show that SINet achieves a PSNR of 38.2 dB, an SSIM of 0.978, and an SAM of 1.82° on simulated data, significantly outperforming baseline methods such as nearest neighbor interpolation, bilinear interpolation, and local histogram matching. When applied to land cover classification, the overall accuracy improves from 74.3% (uncorrected) to 88.5%, approaching the 90.2% accuracy of original Landsat 8 imagery. This study provides an effective solution for restoring historical Landsat 7 data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen, J., Zhu, X., Vogelmann, J. E., Gao, F., & Jin, S. (2011). A simple and effective method for filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC-off images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(4), 1053-1064.

[2] Criminisi, A., Pérez, P., & Toyama, K. (2004). Region filling and object removal by exemplar-based image inpainting. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(9), 1200-1212.

[3] Efros, A. A., & Leung, T. K. (1999). Texture synthesis by non-parametric sampling. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2, 1033-1038.

[4] Guillemot, C., & Le Meur, O. (2014). Image inpainting: Overview and recent advances. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 31(1), 127-144.

[5] He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 770-778.

[6] Johnson, J., Alahi, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2016). Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. European Conference on Computer Vision, 694-711.

[7] Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 25, 1097-1105.

[8] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444.

[9] Li, W., Lin, Z., Zhou, K., Qi, L., Wang, Y., & Jia, J. (2022). MAT: Mask-aware transformer for large hole image inpainting. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10758-10768.

[10] Liu, G., Reda, F. A., Shih, K. J., Wang, T. C., Tao, A., & Catanzaro, B. (2018). Image inpainting for irregular holes using partial convolutions. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 85-100.

[11] Loveland, T. R., & Dwyer, J. L. (2012). Landsat: Building a strong future. Remote Sensing of Environment, 122, 22-29.

[12] Ma, Y., He, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020). Multi-scale feature fusion network for Landsat 7 ETM+ SLC-off gap filling. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 13, 6176-6189.

[13] Markham, B. L., Storey, J. C., Williams, D. L., & Irons, J. R. (2004). Landsat sensor performance: history and current status. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(12), 2691-2694.

[14] Pathak, D., Krahenbuhl, P., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Efros, A. A. (2016). Context encoders: Feature learning by inpainting. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2536-2544.

[15] Pringle, M. J., Schmidt, M., & Muir, J. S. (2009). Geostatistical interpolation of SLC-off Landsat ETM+ images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 64(6), 654-664.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yin, P. (2026). Deep Learning-Based Stripe Restoration Algorithm for Landsat 7. Scientific Journal of Technology, 8(4), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.54691/wt90cw18