Mass Transfer in CO2 Huff-Puff of Shale Oil Reservoirs

Authors

  • Zijiang Yang
  • Haikun Zeng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/1scbfa57

Keywords:

Shale Oil; CO2 huff-n-puff; NMR; Molecular Simulation.

Abstract

Experimental study on the influencing factors of CO2 injection to enhance oil recovery in shale oil reservoirs using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology. The effects of action time, pressure, and temperature on enhanced oil recovery were analyzed based on the NMR T2 (transverse relaxation time) spectrum, and the oil displacement effect of CO2 on crude oil was observed through NMR images. Then, molecular dynamics simulation methods were used to study the interaction laws and mass transfer characteristics between crude oil and carbon dioxide under different conditions, and the results of macroscopic experiments were analyzed using the insights obtained from microscopic simulations. The study shows that during the CO2 injection process, the recovery degree gradually increases with the extension of the action time. As the pressure increases, the recovery degree gradually rises. With the increase in temperature, the recovery degree of shale oil first increases and then gradually decreases. Under immiscible conditions, the recovery degree of crude oil in macropores increases rapidly with the increase of injection pressure; under miscible conditions, the impact of increased injection pressure on the recovery degree of macropores weakens. Regardless of miscibility, the recovery degree of crude oil in micropores basically shows a linear growth with the increase of injection pressure, and as the gas injection pressure increases, the lower limit of CO2-accessible pore size continues to decrease. With the increase of soaking time, the growth rate of crude oil recovery degree in macropores gradually decreases, while the growth rate of crude oil recovery degree in micropores first increases and then decreases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] SHENG J J. Critical review of field EOR projects in shale and tight reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2017,159:654-665.

[2] ZBOROWSKI M. How Conoco Phillips solved its big data problem[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2018, 70(7): 21-26.

[3] GOMAA A M, NINO-PENALOZA A, MCCARTNEY E, et al. Engineering solid particulate diverter to control fracture complexity: Experimental study[R]. SPE179144, 2016.

[4] Yu W, Lashgari H, Sepehrnoori K. Simulation study of CO2 huff-n-puff process in Bakken tight oil reservoirs[C]. SPE 169575, 2014.

[5] Bai J, Liu H, Wang J, et al. CO2, water and N2 injection for enhanced oil recovery with spatialarrangement of fractures in tight-oil reservoirs using huff-n-puff[J]. Energies, 2019, 12(5): 823.

[6] Wang Q, Jiang R, Cui Y, et al. Pre-Darcy flow behavior of CO2 Huff-n-Puff development in Fuyu tight formation: Experiment and numerical evaluation[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 186: 106773.

[7] Du D, Li C, Song X, et al. Experimental study on residue oil distribution after the supercritical CO2 huff-n-puff process in low permeability cores with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)[J]. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2021, 14(10): 103355.

[8] Zhang H, Wang S, Yin X, et al. Soaking in CO2 huff-n-puff: A single-nanopore scale study[J]. Fuel, 2022, 308:122026.

[9] HUANG Liang, ZHOU Wen, XU Hao, et al. Dynamic flfluid states in organic-inorganic nanocomposite: Implications for shale gas recovery and CO2 sequestration[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 411: 128423.

[10] Pang, Y.. , Soliman, M. Y., Deng, H.. , and Hossein Emadi. Effect of Methane Adsorption on Stress-Dependent Porosity and Permeability in Shale Gas Reservoirs. [C] Paper presented at the SPE Low Perm Symposium, Denver, Colorado, USA, May 2016.

[11] Mingyao Wei, Jishan Liu, Xiating Feng, Chunguang Wang, Fubao Zhou, Evolution of shale apparent permeability from stress-controlled to displacement-controlled conditions, [J] Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, Volume 34, 2016, Pages 1453-1460, ISSN 1875-5100.

[12] Xue-wu W, Pufu X, Zheng-ming Y, et al. Laboratory and field-scale parameter optimization of CO2 huff–n–puff with the staged-fracturing horizontal well in tight oil reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2020,186:106703.

[13] Shovkun I, Espinoza DN. Coupled fluid flow-geomechanics simulation in stress-sensitive coal and shale reservoirs: impact of desorption-induced stresses, shearfailure, and fines migration. [J]Fuel 2017;195:260–72.

[14] JILL T, NICK F, MARC S, et al. Tank development in the Midland Basin, Texas: A case study of super-charging a reservoir to optimize production and increase horizontal well densities[R]. URTeC2902895-MS, 2018.

[15] KELVIN A, JOHN Y, DEREK E, et al. Laboratory evaluation of multiphase permeability evolution in tight sandstones: Impact of slickwater and friction reducers[R]. SPE 180250-MS,2016.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yang, Z., & Zeng, H. (2025). Mass Transfer in CO2 Huff-Puff of Shale Oil Reservoirs. Scientific Journal of Technology, 7(7), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.54691/1scbfa57