Recent Advances in Characterizing the Interfacial Mechanical Properties of Composites based on Ultrasonic Inversion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/hmrfk859Keywords:
Composites; Fiber–Matrix Interface; Ultrasonic Characterization; Inversion Algorithms; Nondestructive Testing.Abstract
In response to the growing demand for composite materials with high specific strength, high specific stiffness, and lightweight structural characteristics, this paper systematically reviews the development and research progress of ultrasonic characterization techniques for fiber–matrix interfaces. The mechanical and durability properties of composites are largely governed by the interfacial bonding quality and its evolution mechanisms. However, interfacial damage is often concealed within the material, highlighting the urgent need for quantitative and nondestructive monitoring approaches. First, the paper reviews the emergence and development of the Scanning Acoustic Microscope in the 1970s and elaborates on its pioneering role in revealing interfacial microstructures and early-stage debonding phenomena. Subsequently, it focuses on the quantitative studies since the 1990s based on the imperfect interface spring model, including the introduction of normal and tangential stiffness parameters (KN and KT), the development of reflection/transmission inversion methods, and the establishment of spectrum–angular spectrum analysis techniques. These advances enabled a paradigm shift in interfacial characterization—from mere visualization to quantitative evaluation. In the 21st century, research has further evolved toward refined modeling, optimized inversion algorithms, and engineering-oriented applications, leading to the formation of multi-angle, multi-frequency, and multimodal integrated detection frameworks. By integrating signal processing, finite element simulation, and machine learning, the accuracy and stability of interface parameter inversion have been significantly enhanced. Finally, the paper summarizes the major challenges in this field, including model ill-posedness, adaptability under complex environments, and difficulties in data fusion. It also envisions future developments toward intelligent, real-time, and multi-physics-coupled characterization approaches.
Downloads
References
[1] Briggs A. Acoustic microscopy-a summary[J]. Reports on Progress in Physics, 1992, 55(7): 851.
[2] Lemons R A, Quate C F. Acoustic Microscopy: Biomedical Applications: Variations in elastic properties within a single cell can now be visualized with the acoustic microscope[J]. Science, 1975, 188(4191): 905-911.
[3] Takeda N, Miyasaka C, Nakata K. In-situ scanning acoustic microscopy for damage progress characterization in thermoplastic composites[J]. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 1992, 8(1-6): 813-824.
[4] Maev R G. Acoustic microscopy: Fundamentals and applications[M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
[5] Yen C E, Tittmann B R. Fiber-matrix interface study of carbon-carbon composites using ultrasonics and acoustic microscopy[J]. Composites Engineering, 1995, 5(6): 649-661.
[6] Chu Y C, Rokhlin S I. Fiber‐matrix interphase characterization in composites using ultrasonic velocity data[J]. Journal of applied physics, 1994, 76(7): 4121-4129.
[7] Matikas T E, Karpur P. Ultrasonic reflectivity technique for the characterization of fiber‐matrix interface in metal matrix composites[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1993, 74(1): 228-236.
[8] Lavrentyev A I, Rokhlin S I. Models for ultrasonic characterization of environmental degradation of interfaces in adhesive joints[J]. Journal of applied physics, 1994, 76(8): 4643-4650.
[9] Lavrentyev A I, Rokhlin S I. Ultrasonic spectroscopy of imperfect contact interfaces between a layer and two solids[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998, 103(2): 657-664.
[10] Qu J. Ultrasonic nondestructive characterization of adhesive bonds[J]. 1999.
[11] Rokhlin S I, Huang W. Double spring model for multilayer interfaces[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2002, 112(3): 1049-1060. DOI:10.1121/1.1497369.
[12] Baltazar A, Wang L, **e B, et al. Inverse ultrasonic determination of imperfect interfaces and bulk properties of a layer between two solids[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2003, 114(3): 1424-1434.
[13] Leckey C, Johnston P, Haldren H, et al. Ultrasonic Characterization of Aerospace Composites[C]// International Symposium on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials. 2015 (NF1676L-20473).
[14] Obst A. Composite Structures Research and Technology Activities in ESA[C]//54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law. 2003: I. 1.01.
[15] Katunin A, Wronkowicz-Katunin A, Dragan K. Impact damage evaluation in composite structures based on fusion of results of ultrasonic testing and X-ray computed tomography[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20 (7): 1867.
[16] Chen H L R, Zhang B, Alvin M A, et al. Ultrasonic detection of delamination and material characterization of thermal barrier coatings[J]. Journal of thermal spray technology, 2012, 21(6): 1184 -1194.
[17] Franke B, Sohn Y H, Chen X, et al. Monitoring damage evolution in thermal barrier coatings with thermal wave imaging[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2005, 200(5-6): 1292-1297.
[18] Qu Z, Jiang P, Zhang W. Development and application of infrared thermography non-destructive testing techniques[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(14): 3851.
[19] Baltazar A, Wang L, **e B, et al. Inverse ultrasonic determination of imperfect interfaces and bulk properties of a layer between two solids[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2003, 114(3): 1424-1434.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Scientific Journal of Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






