Research on the Quantitative Evaluation and Methods of Drilling Overflow Risk Based on While-Drilling Information

Authors

  • Yihan Hu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/rhz8ht59

Keywords:

Overflow Risk; Composite Model; CNN-LSTM; Quantitative Evaluation.

Abstract

In order to solve the problems of insufficient generalisation ability and poor interpretability of evaluation results in the complex geological environment of the current data-driven overflow risk assessment model, this paper proposes a quantitative overflow risk assessment method based on the combination of CNN-LSTM data-driven model and fuzzy reasoning system. The data features were extracted, the overflow risk was predicted, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was further adopted, the membership function was generated based on the normal distribution fitting historical data, the risk probability threshold was dynamically calibrated, the risk was refined into low, medium and high levels, and the expert experience was integrated through fuzzy reasoning rules to improve the transparency and flexibility of overflow risk assessment. The experimental results show that the accuracy of the proposed method is 99.95%, and the false alarm rate is only 0.5%, which significantly improves the adaptability and reliability of risk assessment compared with the traditional static threshold method, and enhances the interpretability of the model through feature visualisation and dynamic rules, which provides intelligent decision support with both high precision and strong robustness for drilling safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Qian Zhang. Research and Implementation of Drilling Accident Recognition System Based on Machine Learning[D]. Xi'an Shiyou University, 2021.

[2] Wanjun Hu, Wenhe Xia, Yongjie Li, et al. Intelligent identification method for safety risks during gas drilling operations[J]. Oil exploration and development, 2022, 49(02): 377-384.

[3] Gensheng Li, Xianzhi Song, Zhaopeng Zhu, et al. Research progress and prospects of intelligent drilling technology[J]. Oil drilling technology, 2023, (04).

[4] Tingting He, Qiang Zhang. The current status and development trends of knowledge graphs in oil and gas exploration and development[J]. Natural gas industry, 2024, 44(09): 55-67.

[5] Zixu Guo, Biao Ma, Shuai Zhang, et al. Research progress and technological prospects of deep learning in oil and gas production forecasting [J]. Natural gas industry, 2024, 44(09): 88-98.

[6] Chunlan Zhao, Yao Qu, Bing Wang, et al. A new method for predicting the severity of drilling accidents based on 2D-CNN deep learning [J]. Natural gas industry, 2022, 42(12): 95-105.

[7] Yanan Sheng, Zhichuan Guan, Ming Luo, et al. Quantitative evaluation method for drilling engineering risk based on uncertainty analysis [J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 43(02): 91-96.

[8] Yuqiang XU, Kuan LIU, Baolun HE, et al. Risk pre-assessment method for regional drilling engineering based on deep learning and multi-source data[J]. Petroleum Science, 2023, 20(6):3654-3672.

[9] Wenhe XIA, Zongxu ZHAO, Chengxiao LI, et al. Intelligent risk identification of gas drilling based on nonlinear classification network[J]. Petroleum Science, 2023, 20(5):3074-3084.

[10] Yuhao WANG, Jiasheng HAO, Fan ZHANG, et al. Adaptive LSTM early warning method for kick detection in drilling[J].Control Theory&Applications, 2022, 39(3):441-448.

[11] MIN Chao, Guoquan WEN, Xiaogang LI, et al. Research progress and application prospect of interpretable machine learning in artificial intelligence of oil and gas industry[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(9):114-126.

[12] ARTUN E, KULGA B. Selection of candidate wells for refracturing in tight gas sand reservoirs using fuzzy inference[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2):413-420.

[13] Qiuju XIE, Yanbao GUO, Min ZHANG, et al. Risk assessment of girth welds of high-grade steel pipelines based on fuzzy theory and index method[J]. Oil&Gas Storage and Transportation,2022, 41 (11):1291-1297.

[14] Zhaopeng ZHU,Lin ZHU, Xianzhi SONG, et al. A generalization method of intelligent ROP prediction under mechanism constraints[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(9):179-189.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hu, Y. (2025). Research on the Quantitative Evaluation and Methods of Drilling Overflow Risk Based on While-Drilling Information. Scientific Journal of Technology, 7(9), 183-188. https://doi.org/10.54691/rhz8ht59